Depth: 2

Re: Betrayal Endgame - John Doe

Date: October 7th, 2019 05:59 pm (UTC)
theyregooddogs: (b)
From: [personal profile] theyregooddogs
I would say you are lucky to skip the awkward growing years of the discipline, but it is far from past that.
Depth: 4

Re: Betrayal Endgame - John Doe

Date: October 10th, 2019 02:20 am (UTC)
theyregooddogs: (oh pit of debris)
From: [personal profile] theyregooddogs
Haven't put much thought into how men would diagnose problems of those who are generally perceived as female, have you? They don't really leave room for sympathy.
Depth: 6

Re: Betrayal Endgame - John Doe

Date: October 10th, 2019 02:38 am (UTC)
theyregooddogs: (the song bird rose.)
From: [personal profile] theyregooddogs
I'm aware that many others have them. But if my recollection of scholars is anything, I agree with my past self that the previously less publicized voices are worth listening more acutely too. Something about not being part of dominant socio-economic class tends to make anything worth saying for that group absolutely critical. Go figure.
Depth: 8

Re: Betrayal Endgame - John Doe

Date: October 10th, 2019 03:19 am (UTC)
theyregooddogs: (z)
From: [personal profile] theyregooddogs
Really, skip the fundamental years. They're not worth reviewing.
Depth: 10

Re: Betrayal Endgame - John Doe

Date: October 11th, 2019 06:27 pm (UTC)
theyregooddogs: (and in it my longing fell)
From: [personal profile] theyregooddogs
Sure, if you want the foundation for later interpretation on top of public and professional response. Knock yourself out.

 

an entertaining thing to do would be to replace every instance of “for ritual purposes” in any archeology article with “for funsies”